- 51社区黑料
- Events
- Inquiry Support
- Workshops & Programs
- SoTL 101: Introduction to SoTL and Teaching + Learning Inquiry
- SoTL 102: Formulating an Inquiry Project
- SoTL Thoughts
- Coffee + Conversation
- Tools for Inquiry: Conducting Inquiry Using CES
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Decolonial Teaching + Learning Seminar Series
- Decolonizing and Indigenizing Curricula
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning: Supporting Learning in Online Environments
- Open Education Grant Pilot Program
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Project Archive
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom Projects
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Scholarship of Teaching + Learning Projects
- Conferences & Calls for Proposals
- Cfp: 2026 SoTL Symposium [Deadline: May 04, 2026]
- 2026 Graduate Students in Teaching Conference [May 05-06, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: May 5, 2026 [May 05-14, 2026]
- Brave Conversations: Revisiting and Rethinking "Risk" in SoTL [May 07, 2026]
- 2026 Teaching and Learning Innovations Conference [Deadline: May 08, 2026]
- 3rd Annual Thompson-Okanagan Teaching and Learning Conference [May 13-14, 2026]
- Supporting vs. Doing Student Work: Experiments with Offline AI In the Classroom [May 14, 2026]
- Panel Discussion: Research Ethics and SoTL [May 15, 2026]
- SoTL Canada Journal Club: Developing a SoTL Identity [May 19, 2026]
- FLO MicroCourse: Write your Teaching Philosophy Statement [May 19-26, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: May 19, 2026 [May 19-28, 2026]
- 2026 Annual STLHE/SAPES Conference [Deadline: May 25, 2026]
- Cfp: Graduate Students/Post-docs Teaching in Higher Education Conference [Deadline: May 25, 2026]
- ETUG Spring 2026 Workshop: Collaboration, Co-creation, and Creativity in EdTech [May 28-29, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: June 1, 2026 [June 01-10, 2026]
- Cfp: 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [Deadline: June 29, 2026]
- Graduate Students/Post-docs Teaching in Higher Education Conference [August 07, 2026]
- 2026 DPI Conference [August 18-20, 2026]
- 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [October 01-02, 2026]
- 2026 SoTL Symposium Conference [October 22-24, 2026]
- For Research Personnel
- News + Stories
- AI as learning coach: project explores ChatGPT integration beyond plagiarism concerns
- Investigating the motivations and perceptions of undergraduate students using AI for assignments
- Faculty teaching confidence soars through peer observation program
- Research proves role plays work: evidence-based approach transforms history and labour studies teaching
Academic Integrity, Communication, Art and Technology, Interactive Arts and Technology, Artificial Intelligence
AI as learning coach: project explores ChatGPT integration beyond plagiarism concerns
When 18 students used ChatGPT as a learning partner in an intensive VR development course, the results challenged common assumptions about AI's role in education and revealed new approaches to maintaining authenticity while embracing technological assistance.
The Project
Bernhard Riecke's "Semester in Alternate Realities" course moved beyond typical AI restrictions to explore how students naturally integrate ChatGPT into complex, authentic project work. Rather than focusing on plagiarism prevention, the research examined AI's potential as a personalized learning coach that could enhance creativity and critical thinking in interdisciplinary VR development.
Students used AI for brainstorming, technical troubleshooting, code assistance, and reflective writing while maintaining ownership of their creative vision and learning process. The approach emphasized developing critical AI literacy alongside technical and creative skills.
Project Highlights
AI amplified existing learning patterns rather than creating new behaviors. Students who approached projects thoughtfully used AI as a sophisticated research partner, while those seeking shortcuts often received outputs that didn't meaningfully advance their work.
The balance between instructor guidance and student agency became more complex but potentially more empowering. AI assistance allowed students to tackle more ambitious technical challenges while spending more time on higher-order thinking and creative problem-solving.
Authenticity shifted from "doing everything yourself" to "taking responsibility for learning process." Successful projects showed clear evidence of human insight and creativity even when AI assisted with specific tasks, emphasizing ownership of creative vision over tool restrictions.
Looking Ahead
Findings have been shared through presentations at SFU's Teaching Innovation Lab and SIAT research colloquium, with resources available at the course website. Riecke now contributes to SFU's AI learning and teaching task force, helping develop institutional approaches to thoughtful AI integration in higher education. Riecke also shared his findings at TILT鈥檚 SoTL Thoughts, AI in the Classroom: Evidence-based Insights from 51社区黑料Colleagues.