- 51ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ
- Events
- Inquiry Support
- Workshops & Programs
- SoTL 101: Introduction to SoTL and Teaching + Learning Inquiry
- SoTL 102: Formulating an Inquiry Project
- SoTL Thoughts
- Coffee + Conversation
- Tools for Inquiry: Conducting Inquiry Using CES
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Decolonial Teaching + Learning Seminar Series
- Decolonizing and Indigenizing Curricula
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning: Supporting Learning in Online Environments
- Open Education Grant Pilot Program
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Project Archive
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom Projects
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Scholarship of Teaching + Learning Projects
- Conferences & Calls for Proposals
- FLO MicroCourse: AI-Resilient Assessment Design Sprint [April 27 - May 1, 2026]
- 2026 Dalhousie Conference on University Teaching and Learning [Deadline: May 01, 2026]
- Cfp: 2026 SoTL Symposium [Deadline: May 04, 2026]
- 2026 Graduate Students in Teaching Conference [May 05-06, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: May 5, 2026 [May 05-14, 2026]
- Brave Conversations: Revisiting and Rethinking "Risk" in SoTL [May 07, 2026]
- 2026 Teaching and Learning Innovations Conference [Deadline: May 08, 2026]
- 3rd Annual Thompson-Okanagan Teaching and Learning Conference [May 13-14, 2026]
- Supporting vs. Doing Student Work: Experiments with Offline AI In the Classroom [May 14, 2026]
- Panel Discussion: Research Ethics and SoTL [May 15, 2026]
- SoTL Canada Journal Club: Developing a SoTL Identity [May 19, 2026]
- FLO MicroCourse: Write your Teaching Philosophy Statement [May 19-26, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: May 19, 2026 [May 19-28, 2026]
- 2026 Annual STLHE/SAPES Conference [Deadline: May 25, 2026]
- Cfp: Graduate Students/Post-docs Teaching in Higher Education Conference [Deadline: May 25, 2026]
- ETUG Spring 2026 Workshop: Collaboration, Co-creation, and Creativity in EdTech [May 28-29, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: June 1, 2026 [June 01-10, 2026]
- Cfp: 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [Deadline: June 29, 2026]
- Graduate Students/Post-docs Teaching in Higher Education Conference [August 07, 2026]
- 2026 DPI Conference [August 18-20, 2026]
- 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [October 01-02, 2026]
- 2026 SoTL Symposium Conference [October 22-24, 2026]
- For Research Personnel
- News + Stories
- AI as learning coach: project explores ChatGPT integration beyond plagiarism concerns
- Investigating the motivations and perceptions of undergraduate students using AI for assignments
- Faculty teaching confidence soars through peer observation program
- Research proves role plays work: evidence-based approach transforms history and labour studies teaching
Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Academic Misconduct in the Business Classroom
Grant program: Teaching and Learning Development Grant (TLDG)
Grant recipient: Andrew Flostrand, Beedie School of Business
Project team: Sarah Lord Ferguson, research assistant
Timeframe: March 2018 to August 2018
Funding: $6000
Courses addressed:
- BUEC 232 – Data and Decisions I
- BUS 200 – Business Fundamentals
- BUS 336 – Data and Decisions II
Final report: View Andrew Flostrand's final report (PDF)
Description: The goals of the research project will be to:
1. Identify opinions of the aggregate pool of Beedie Undergraduate program students regarding what activities they believe constitute academic dishonesty.
2. Determine the students’ prioritization of the above activities in terms of severity.
3. Obtain estimates of the amount of such acts of academic dishonesty that are currently occurring in the Beedie Undergraduate program, (e.g., percentage of students who are doing it, what activities are most common, what type and scale of impact dishonesty is having on ‘honest’ students, if any).
4. Gain student input as to the activities and measures that they feel the University should exercise to address and/or prevent acts of academic dishonesty.
Questions addressed:
- What do business professors and instructors view as the most common and most unethical examples of academic dishonesty?
- What reasoning leads to students engaging in dishonest behaviour?
- What are some forms of academic dishonesty students are aware of? What do students view as the most common?
- What are undergraduate business student’s attitudes towards academic dishonesty? Specifically, how do students rate various scenarios illustrating academic dishonesty on a scale from ethical to unethical.
- What do students view as the most important activities that the University should engage in to address academic dishonesty?
- Are students aware of SFU’s policy on academic integrity?
Knowledge sharing: Findings were discussed informally with colleagues and PhD students in the department. The results of the study will be written into an academic paper and submitted to a journal. We will target a business education journal. We would also like to present it at a conference if one of the collaborators is able to attend one in the next year.
Keywords: Academic dishonesty; academic integrity; cheating; business students; student ethics; ethics