- 51社区黑料
- Events
- Inquiry Support
- Workshops & Programs
- SoTL 101: Introduction to SoTL and Teaching + Learning Inquiry
- SoTL 102: Formulating an Inquiry Project
- SoTL Thoughts
- Coffee + Conversation
- Tools for Inquiry: Conducting Inquiry Using CES
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Decolonial Teaching + Learning Seminar Series
- Decolonizing and Indigenizing Curricula
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning: Supporting Learning in Online Environments
- Open Education Grant Pilot Program
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Project Archive
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom Projects
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Scholarship of Teaching + Learning Projects
- Conferences & Calls for Proposals
- Cfp: 2026 SoTL Symposium [Deadline: May 04, 2026]
- 2026 Graduate Students in Teaching Conference [May 05-06, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: May 5, 2026 [May 05-14, 2026]
- Brave Conversations: Revisiting and Rethinking "Risk" in SoTL [May 07, 2026]
- 2026 Teaching and Learning Innovations Conference [Deadline: May 08, 2026]
- 3rd Annual Thompson-Okanagan Teaching and Learning Conference [May 13-14, 2026]
- Supporting vs. Doing Student Work: Experiments with Offline AI In the Classroom [May 14, 2026]
- Panel Discussion: Research Ethics and SoTL [May 15, 2026]
- SoTL Canada Journal Club: Developing a SoTL Identity [May 19, 2026]
- FLO MicroCourse: Write your Teaching Philosophy Statement [May 19-26, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: May 19, 2026 [May 19-28, 2026]
- 2026 Annual STLHE/SAPES Conference [Deadline: May 25, 2026]
- Cfp: Graduate Students/Post-docs Teaching in Higher Education Conference [Deadline: May 25, 2026]
- ETUG Spring 2026 Workshop: Collaboration, Co-creation, and Creativity in EdTech [May 28-29, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: June 1, 2026 [June 01-10, 2026]
- Cfp: 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [Deadline: June 29, 2026]
- Graduate Students/Post-docs Teaching in Higher Education Conference [August 07, 2026]
- 2026 DPI Conference [August 18-20, 2026]
- 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [October 01-02, 2026]
- 2026 SoTL Symposium Conference [October 22-24, 2026]
- For Research Personnel
- News + Stories
- AI as learning coach: project explores ChatGPT integration beyond plagiarism concerns
- Investigating the motivations and perceptions of undergraduate students using AI for assignments
- Faculty teaching confidence soars through peer observation program
- Research proves role plays work: evidence-based approach transforms history and labour studies teaching
Evaluating the Use of Anonymous Peer Review of Drafts in a W Course
Grant program: Teaching and Learning Development Grant (TLDG)
Project team: Jillian Scott McIntosh, Department of Philosophy
Support provided: Development of proposal, RA to organize data collection and analysis
Timeframe: January 2007 to January 2008
Description: Use of the anonymous peer review feature of Turnitin.com in a first-year course. The goal was to make students more reflective about their own writing by giving them the opportunity to provide feedback to others and to receive feedback from others. Data collection focused on the quality of the peer reviews and the relationship of this on next drafts produced by both reviewers and reviewees.
Questions: Is there a correlation between (a) how students perceive the quality of peer review and the grade they receive on their revised draft?; (b) how a student perceives the quality of peer review and the degree of improvement between initial and revised drafts?; and (c) the perceived quality of a peer review by the student who receives it and the grade received by the student who wrote the peer review? Is there improvement in quality between first and second peer reviews?
Knowledge sharing: Presentation to members of the Institute for the Study of Teaching and Learning in the Disciplines (including those involved in W courses).