- 51ÉçÇøºÚÁÏ
- Events
- Inquiry Support
- Workshops & Programs
- SoTL 101: Introduction to SoTL and Teaching + Learning Inquiry
- SoTL 102: Formulating an Inquiry Project
- SoTL Thoughts
- Coffee + Conversation
- Tools for Inquiry: Conducting Inquiry Using CES
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Decolonial Teaching + Learning Seminar Series
- Decolonizing and Indigenizing Curricula
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom: An Integrated Seminar Series + Grants Program
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning: Supporting Learning in Online Environments
- Open Education Grant Pilot Program
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Project Archive
- Amundsen Fellowship Program
- Disrupting Colonialism through Teaching Program
- Exploring Well-being in Learning Environments Program
- Inquiring into Your Multilingual Classroom Projects
- New Ways of Teaching, New Ways of Learning
- Teaching and Learning Development Grant Program
- Scholarship of Teaching + Learning Projects
- Conferences & Calls for Proposals
- FLO MicroCourse: AI-Resilient Assessment Design Sprint [April 27 - May 1, 2026]
- Faculty Experiences with Open Pedagogy and Social Justice [April 30, 2026]
- 2026 Dalhousie Conference on University Teaching and Learning [Deadline: May 01, 2026]
- Cfp: 2026 SoTL Symposium [Deadline: May 04, 2026]
- 2026 Graduate Students in Teaching Conference [May 05-06, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: May 5, 2026 [May 05-14, 2026]
- Brave Conversations: Revisiting and Rethinking "Risk" in SoTL [May 07, 2026]
- 2026 Teaching and Learning Innovations Conference [Deadline: May 08, 2026]
- 3rd Annual Thompson-Okanagan Teaching and Learning Conference [May 13-14, 2026]
- Panel Discussion: Research Ethics and SoTL [May 15, 2026]
- SoTL Canada Journal Club: Developing a SoTL Identity [May 19, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: May 19, 2026 [May 19-28, 2026]
- 2026 Annual STLHE/SAPES Conference [Deadline: May 25, 2026]
- Cfp: Graduate Students/Post-docs Teaching in Higher Education Conference [Deadline: May 25, 2026]
- ETUG Spring 2026 Workshop: Collaboration, Co-creation, and Creativity in EdTech [May 28-29, 2026]
- Teaching with AI: June 1, 2026 [June 01-10, 2026]
- Cfp: 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [Deadline: June 29, 2026]
- Graduate Students/Post-docs Teaching in Higher Education Conference [August 07, 2026]
- 2026 DPI Conference [August 18-20, 2026]
- 2026 Global Students as Partners Roundtable [October 01-02, 2026]
- 2026 SoTL Symposium Conference [October 22-24, 2026]
- For Research Personnel
- News + Stories
- AI as learning coach: project explores ChatGPT integration beyond plagiarism concerns
- Investigating the motivations and perceptions of undergraduate students using AI for assignments
- Faculty teaching confidence soars through peer observation program
- Research proves role plays work: evidence-based approach transforms history and labour studies teaching
Effectiveness of Various Active Learning Components in Large First-Year Physics Courses
Grant program: Teaching and Learning Development Grant (TLDG)
Grant recipient: Barbara Frisken, Department of Physics
Project team: Daria Ahrensmeier, Center for Educational Excellence, Sarah Johnson, Department of Physics, Cristina Cordoba, research assistant
Timeframe: January 2020 to November 2021
Funding: $3,900
Courses addressed:
- PHYS 101 – Physics for the Life Science I
- PHYS 102 – Physics for the Life Sciences II
- PHYS 120 – Mechanics and Modern Physics
- PHYS 121 – Optics, Electricity and Magnetism
Final report: View Barbara Frisken's final report (PDF)
Description: The study will investigate the effectiveness of the different components used to teach first-year physics students. We would like to investigate how effective each of these components are; i.e. how much they contribute to student learning. These components include lectures, pre-lecture readings or videos with concept quizzes, clicker questions in class, online homework, hand-written homework, and weekly tutorials. For the instructor, it is a logistical challenge to create and coordinate all of these components, and also very time-consuming. Furthermore, students do not participate in all of these components, which may indicate that the time commitment is too demanding for them, or that they don’t see the value of specific course components. We hope that this study will inform our practice by identifying the course components that seem to be most effective for student learning, and help us to make the best use of everybody’s time.
Questions addressed:
- What are the faculty members’ views of use and effectiveness of different components?
- What are the students’ views of use and effectiveness of different components?
- How do faculty and student views compare?
- What can we learn about the effectiveness of the different components from participation and assessment data?
- How do student views of effectiveness/value/use of course components compare to their behaviour (log/online data) and their course outcomes (grades)?
Knowledge sharing: We will share our results at a department meeting, at an ISTLD Poster Session, and a Teaching Matters Seminar. We will also compile a lecture slide outlining the benefits of the different methods to motivate students and a short (1-page) summary to share with faculty in the department. In addition, we plan to share our results with other physicists, for example, by presenting at the Canadian Association of Physicists Annual Meeting.
Keywords: Large first year physics courses; multiple learning tools; compare student and faculty perceptions of effectiveness; attempt to extract support for effectiveness from course data